MICHAEL AMIDEI.COM
  • Main
  • Journal
  • Books
  • Poetry
  • Podcast
  • Music
  • Contact

Is My Entire Life An Exercise In Ego Gratification? (Helping others vs. Entertaining Others)

12/17/2014

3 Comments

 
I surround myself with creators. With people who imagine things and work to make them a reality. Ideas are the currency in which I usually deal and I absolutely love them. Stories (and myths) to me are incredibly important and I feel that there is a deep reservoir of knowledge that comes with our embracing the native elements present in them and applying them to our own lives. 

In other words, I believe that art matters.

But, with growing frequency, I find myself seeing the state of the world and wondering if this is truly the best use of my time. Doesn't the world need food more than more popular music? Don't people need medical care, equality, human rights, water, and beyond? 

How does the latest Radiohead album help them? What purpose does it serve to write a poem, or a song, a novel, or create a film? Playing a concert to a fawning and excited audience might be fun and feed the ego, but it does nothing for those who in the world who can't help themselves. 

Many will argue with me and I understand what they're saying. Others tell me to build the platform through art and then use that to increase what I can do for others. All good ideas. 

I suppose that, deep down, I suspect that I am only good at the art and that the art isn't worth a lot to a world that requires so much. This is difficult for me to process, but I need to be deeply honest with myself about it. 

More than once, I have been ready to give my life to something I thought mattered, only to find that they were fairy dust; that the paths were nothing but stubbornly persistent theater performances presented in everyday life. Is it possible that art, that music, that words, that my entire professional focus, is the same way?

Or, is it all an illusion? This strikes me as the most possible of all of these ideas. 

I have yet to work this out in my head and in my heart, but it IS being worked out. The answer is being sought. It will inform the next part of the story that I'm living. 

- M
3 Comments
Becca
12/16/2014 09:37:10 pm

Art as platform has worked for you before. Even those struggling to fulfill basic needs create and find hope within the most natural and primitive forms of art.

Reply
mingo
12/17/2014 01:55:39 am

This requires a long response, as in it could fill up an entire book. So, briefly...

There will always be people in need and you always have the option of giving and helping out when you can. But as far as choosing "Art" as a vocation as opposed to another vocation, perhaps a more noble vocation - let's look at that:

What historically remains as a society? It is the architecture, literature, paintings, sculptures and so on that remains - in other words, the "Art" of that society is the only record we have that remains. Even the events of famine, misfortune and lost wars, or basically a society in need would not be known if it wasn't for the historical documents or literature that captured those moments.

And besides, who's to say that being an "artist" holds any less importance than another vocation or job that one could take. Examples, does working at an insurance company, selling mostly useless garbage at Wall-Mart, being a hedge fund manager or any other random job that people do really benefit humanity? Sure, they may play their role in the current society at least in an economic standpoint. Even a position that seems more noble such as Farmer, Doctor, or CEO of the Red Cross might on its face seem like a job that benefits society or humanity more, but they still get paid to do it. And besides, who's to say which is more important? When a soldier away at war gets to take a brief moment to watch a USO sponsored concert - I'd say that holds significance. Or when you hear a song that makes you want to sing along or dance for no reason - who really knows the profound significance of that or why our souls are affected the way they are.

So basically my point is - No matter your vocation, take time out of your life to do good things. But keep in mind that making "art" is just as significant as planting a crop. It may not feed your body, but it will feed your soul and that is what makes life worth living.

Art lives forever.

Reply
Draven Grey link
12/17/2014 07:42:43 am

I've struggled with the same question before. In my studies (you know which ones I'm talking about), I came to see most charitable works to only treat a symptom, while creative works (for lack of better term) address people on a core level. Feeding the hungry may give them a full belly, or, in the many medical missions my family went on, treating lice may relieve the itchiness for a day, but the next day the problem is there again because it's just a symptom. Giving someone an inspiring story, instruction, music or art that moves them emotionally, inspires them, offers hope, makes them dream, or otherwise makes their life better, addresses core issues and needs and will keep doing so for many years after their first encounter with it.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Art
    Music
    Psychology

    Archives

    February 2019
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    February 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    August 2013
    May 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    May 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011

    RSS Feed


  • Main
  • Journal
  • Books
  • Poetry
  • Podcast
  • Music
  • Contact